Business
Sikkim HC strikes down service tax on lottery distributors+holds central rule imposing lottery fee ultra vires
The Sikkim High Court on Wednesday provided double relief to lottery distributors in two separate judgments delivered on 14th October: in one order, the court struck down amendments in the 2015 budget (Finance Act) which imposed service tax on lottery distributors and in a separate order, the same bench struck down Rule 3(11) of Lotteries Regulation (Rules), 2010 as being ultra vires of the parent statute.
a. Service tax matter
In the matter M/s. Future Gaming & Hotel Services Pvt. Ltd. along with M/s. Summit Online Trade Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Others, a division bench comprising of Justices MM Rai and SP Wangdi struck down provisions of the Finance Act as amended in 2015, which imposed service tax on lottery distributors. Finance Act 2015 had introduced an explanation which excluded lottery distribution services from the negative list of betting, gambling and lottery (which is exempt from service tax).
The High Court opined that distribution services offered by lottery operators wherein they either purchase lottery tickets in bulk from state governments or market and promote lotteries organised by the state government are actionable claims and therefore excluded from the definition of service.
The Court further noted that taxation of gambling, betting and lottery falls within the jurisdiction of the state government by virtue of entry 62 of List II of Schedule VII of the Constitution and therefore the central government may not have power to impose service tax.
Further, the bench also observed that by insertion of an explanation in the Finance Act, 2015, the original scope of definition of service was sought to be expanded, which was ultra vires and not permitted as per recognised rules of statutory interpretation.
The judgment comes as a major relief for lottery distributors Sugal & Damani as well as Martin Groups, who have been fighting a long legal battle over various amendments and notifications issued by the central government imposing service tax in various forums. Kamlesh Vijay, Group CEO of Sugal & Damani said, “We feel vindicated that the Sikkim High Court has accepted our contentions and struck down service tax imposed on lottery distributors. The Sikkim High Court has directed the central government and all its agencies to refrain from collecting any amount of service tax from lottery distributors in terms of our prayer before the court. This is a positive development for the lottery and gaming industry.” (Sugal & Damani group company, Summit Online Trade Solutions was party to the litigation)
b. Writ petition challenging the validity of Rule 3(11) of the Lotteries Regulation (Rules), 2010
In a related development, the same bench of Justices Rai and Wangdi in M/s. Shubh Enterprises v. Union of India & Others, struck down Rule 3(11) of the Lotteries Regulation (Rules), 2010 which allowed states under whose jurisdiction lotteries are being sold to charge a minimum fee of two thousand rupees from the organising state.
The High Court reasoned that there was no provision under the parent legislation, i.e. the Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998 which permits levy of such fee or charge. Further, the bench noted that under the constitutional provisions, the Parliament is given the power to merely regulate the sale of lotteries by state or central governments, while the power to tax or levy fees on such activities lies with the respective state governments.
Both these decisions are expected to provide respite to lottery operators and agents. Advaita Legal Senior Partner AR Madhav Rao appeared for the lottery operators in both the matters. Additional Solicitor General Kaushik Chanda appeared for the Union of India in the challenge to the Lotteries Regulation (Rules) while Advocate DK Singh appeared for the Union of India in the service tax matter. The Sikkim government was represented by Additional Advocate General JB Pradhan in both the matters.
Delta Corp invests $10 million in Essel Group-backed Jalesh Cruises, gets preferred right to operate casinos on cruise ships
Goa govt grants yet another 6 month extension to offshore casinos
Sri Lanka drastically hikes casino license fee and taxes; introduces $50 entry fee
Two weeks left for ASEAN Gaming Summit Manila
Delta Corp invests Rs. 15.50 crores in fantasy sports portal HalaPlay, divests its fantasy sports portal
kumar
October 19, 2015 at 7:13 am
Hi jay satya,
In India thousands of people playing in bet365?any cases filed for not declaring e-wallet accounts after black money window period?
kumar
October 19, 2015 at 7:14 am
Friends please help me
Hi friends can any body help in this regard.
In India any cases filed for not declaring e-wallet Acoounts or winnings from bet365 after black money window period.
Can we get such information from rti?
Jay Sayta
October 19, 2015 at 11:39 am
you can ask the CBDT for such information through RTI. Merely because no cases are registered does not mean that they are complying with the applicable laws.
kumar
October 19, 2015 at 4:15 pm
Thanks jay,
Have u heard about any such cases
Jay Sayta
October 20, 2015 at 10:24 am
No- I haven’t heard of any such cases.
Sanket Kini
October 20, 2015 at 7:27 am
Dear sir,
Thank you for all your valuable answers. I would like to know a solution for this scenario!!
1) . Say I am betting on sports via., BET365.com & I had won around 2 crore indian rupees.
2) . Now I got to transfer the money to my Indian bank account from bet365
3) . Say I got a NETELLER account & I transfer the 2 crore Indian rupees to the neteller account
4) . Then I transfer the money from NETELLER to my local Indian bank account.
5) . It is assumed that all the transactions made are in terms of Indian rupees.
6) . And I file tax returns @ 30% if 2 crore Indian rupees & I pay a tax of 60 lakh indian rupees.
Now do you find any LEGAL violations in the above transactions!!? If so what is it about?.
I could say it would be the source of income. And it is to be noted that the money is transferred in terms of inr all through. No foreign currencies involved.
Will I face any troubles from the tax authorities? I live in tamilnadu sir.
Can you advice on the above scenario? Thank you sir.
Sanket Kini
October 20, 2015 at 7:27 am
Dear sir,
Thank you for all your valuable answers. I would like to know a solution for this scenario!!
1) . Say I am betting on sports via., BET365.com & I had won around 6 crore indian rupees.
2) . Now I got to transfer the money to my Indian bank account from bet365
3) . Say I got a NETELLER account & I transfer the 2 crore Indian rupees to the neteller account
4) . Then I transfer the money from NETELLER to my local Indian bank account.
5) . It is assumed that all the transactions made are in terms of Indian rupees.
6) . And I file tax returns @ 30% if 2 crore Indian rupees & I pay a tax of 60 lakh indian rupees.
Now do you find any LEGAL violations in the above transactions!!? If so what is it about?.
I could say it would be the source of income. And it is to be noted that the money is transferred in terms of inr all through. No foreign currencies involved.
Will I face any troubles from the tax authorities? I live in tamilnadu sir.
Can you advice on the above scenario? Thank you sir.
kumar
October 23, 2015 at 9:02 pm
Thank you jay
kumar
October 23, 2015 at 9:24 pm
Sanket,
If u r caught u need to pay 4 crore and will be improsned
Kumar
November 5, 2015 at 3:20 am
Hi jai satya,
Please suggest me is there any offence in the following scenario.
If I transfer 1 lakh to bet365 through neteller and lost it after few days if I won 1 lakh from bet365 and credit back to my bank account?
Surajit Dutta
September 4, 2016 at 6:43 am
For Summit Online, I had appeared and conducted the case whereas Mr. Madhav Rao appeared for Future Gaming..